Hijabs and Tight Skirts

I wrote earlier about the pseudo-conformity of non-Western immigrants to Canadian society (specifically about Indians) here. Well, Muslim immigrants are no different.

Above are photos (from around the web) that I found where these hijabed girls are also wearing extremely tight skirts. The variation gets worse, where I'm seeing hijabed girls with tight jeans or even leggings that show their protruding behinds and thighs.

I wonder what the Imams think of this? I think they actually give temporary permission to these "Canadian" Muslim girls to wear such clothing so that they can blend in with the rest of the society. It is another stealthy encroachment of Muslims into the West. As these adolescent girls grow up, they become more strict, if what the older women wear is any indication. They will be better versed in Islam, and uncontested believers. They will also make great advocates for Islam. Canadians who think that Muslims will integrate into Canadian society have it all wrong. They just need to look at (the obvious) details to realize what is going on.

Read More...

^Top

Indian And Proud (In Canada)

The blog title is from the refrain: Proud to be Canadian. This refrain is perhaps chanted once a year on Canada Day by hyphenated Canadians, while all the other days of the year they are proud to be, well, wherever they came from.

I actually don't blame them. It is hard to be a Canadian in Canada.

These are the notes I typed down on the bus on my way back to Toronto from New York.

Bus ride

- Indian women sitting across the aisle from each other
- Both talk about finishing or being in post graduate work
- Talk to each other in mixture of Indian language and English
- One has a white boyfriend, sitting in front of her, "occupied" on his iPad. Occasionally he turns around and shows her something.
- A lot of their conversation in English is on Indian stuff both here and in India
- The screen saver of the one next to me is some Indian star in a sari

- Mannerisms:

- eating with mouth open
- strong odor of body cream or perfume
- Indian style sandals

- No chance of assimilation, let alone acculturation

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The young white man seems to have acquiesced to the "Indian in Canada" life style. The two young women can keep talking in their mixed English/Hindi all they want. He will enter the conversation when he can (possibly when they give him an inroad). Otherwise he is content to entertain himself. He sits on a public bus, driving through the landscape of his country, yet he is more alien than are his foreign travel companions.

Read More...

^Top

$10,000 To Go Back Home

The famous Canadian mosaic, falling apart at its seams

A few days ago, I posted a blog rather dramatically titled Thieves and Hypocrites on nonwhite immigrants that have settled in Canada with no intention of becoming Canadians. I still stand by that title, although I might also add liars to the mix, despite a hypocrite being a kind of liar.

I keep using those words a lot in conversations. Recently I said the following, after shootings at a block party in the northern part of Toronto. The guests and shooters were all immigrants, or immigrants turned "citizens," from nonwhite countries.

I said something like:

"Harper's government should start the process of sending back nonwhite immigrants back to their countries of origin. All (this really is without exception) the nonwhite immigrants I encounter, either superficially or through longer interactions, when discussing their place and presence in Canada, ALWAYS talk about their dissatisfaction with Canada, where they expected to advance further in their lives, in terms of wealth or career or feelings of "acceptance." Almost all their conversations revolve around this country of origin, which some have never even seen. Many second generation immigrants (those born in Canada) spend a considerable amount of their time thinking about and discussing a country they have never seen, and re-inventing their cultural background on that mythical country. They say they feel alienated from the main stream Canadian culture. They spend all their time with like-minded immigrants, and not just nonwhites, but those from their specific cultural and national background.

Let Harper give each "family" a one-off $10,000 check for its members to relinquish their Canadian citizenship or landed immigrant status (the same as a green card in the U.S.). And a one way plane ticket back to their countries of origin for each family member. This sounds unfeasible, and many would probably not accept it. All kinds of organizations will scream "racism" etc. Politicians will use it as bait for the next elections. But some immigrants will go back. They can then use this money, large by Third World standards, to improve their own countries, building small businesses, schools, hospitals or clinics, pharmacies, hotels, factories, and so on, from all they have learned through their years in Canadian schools, universities, and their various employments. Even the governments they return to will benefit, since not only are they getting aid (this could be considered a form of international aid) but they'd get the best manpower possible: people who would financially invest in the country, and also who have strong cultural, social, psychological and emotional attachments to the country.

These immigrant-returnees can then start pulling back all the unhappy immigrant youth, some who terrorize Canadian cities with guns and violence. These immigrant-returnees can start the proud work of rebuilding their countries, which have reached terrible states partly because there is NO-ONE to build and sustain them! Younger generations can then spend their time, energy, education and smarts doing useful, even honorable, things, instead of shooting each other (and others) up. This is the gift that immigrant-returnees can give to their alienated children.

Why $10,000? This is about what the average amount a person gets from Canadian welfare checks over the span of a year (it is probably more with many other amenities that are not directly attached to the actual check). Rather than hand out this free $10,000, year after year, to immigrant (which includes naturalized citizens - the criteria for whom can be worked out later) welfare recipients, the Canadian government can simply give these $10,000 to a certain number of "eligible" immigrants every year. The checks would be handed out in one installment to each eligible immigrant family. This would be the last check that such immigrants would receive from the Canadian government.

This would continue until immigrant numbers have been considerably reduced. It could be a five to ten year plan.

At the same time, the government should follow a strict policy of reducing immigration into the country. This also includes reducing the number of "refugees" who enter into Canada. People fleeing war torn countries can be provided with special countries of refuge near, even adjacent to, their countries of origin. Since wars and droughts are always temporary, as are even fascist governments, their refuge will be considered temporary. If that's not the case, then they can slowly be assimilated into the country of refuge, which should be a relatively easy task since these refuge countries are similar to their own. International bodies such as the UN, and countries like the U.S. and Canada can also help establish these protocols."

I often met with a shocked silence. But no-one has come out and condemned my suggestions.

The Mayor of Toronto, Rob Ford, said something very similar. Except his was based on crime prevention. After the shooting at the "block party" he said the shooters, and their affiliates, should all be deported. Uproar ensued. "These are Canadians!" "They were born in Canada!" "What will they do back in a country they know nothing about?"

This is what Ford said:

"I’m going to sit down with the prime minister and find out how our immigration laws work...Obviously I have an idea, but whatever I can do to get ’em out of the city, I’m going to. Regardless of if they have family or friends, I don’t want these people, if they’re convicted of a gun crime, to have anything to do with the city of Toronto."

I agreed with him.

Read More...

^Top

Anti-Semitism Is Evil Intentions Towards Jews

A group of Jews, including a small boy, is escorted from
the Warsaw Ghetto by German soldiers in this April 19, 1943 photo.
The picture formed part of a report from SS Gen. Stroop
to his Commanding Officer, and was introduced as evidence
to the War Crimes trials in Nuremberg in 1945. (AP Photo)
[Source: The Atlantic, Oct 16, 2011]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GalliaWatch writes:

Here's a must-read article posted in English at Front Page Magazine, and in French at Riposte Laïque. The author, Giulio Meotti describes the end of European Jewry, as Islam slowly but surely takes over. Whatever happens to the Jews, you can be sure, will happen to all of us.

I agree with the overall warning in her article, but I think we should look at anti-Semitism and its evil intentions towards Jews as something that happens to Jews. Of course, all evil eventually destroys what is before it. But, the intention of anti-Semitism is the destruction of Jews. I think we should be able to understand that without transferring it to us.

I do agree, though, that Islam has a more thorough system of elimination, and a wider span. Its strongest hatred is directed at Jews, but all other infidels follow. In terms of combating Islam, it is important to understand this method of elimination, because, yes, as Giulio Meotti writes, next are all the other infidels.

Read More...

^Top

Canada the Convenient

The blog title is a take on "Toronto the Good."

In the area of one block, this is what I saw yesterday:

1). An "extended" Indian family

Three generations of Grewals live in their five-bedroom pebble-dashed house...

There's mum and dad, Sarbjit and Arvinder...; eldest son Sunny together with his fiance Shay; pregnant daughter Kaki with husband Jeet; and youngest son Tindy.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There were several adults, including what looked like mother, father, an elderly man who could be a grandfather, an elderly woman who looked too old to be a grandmother and could be a great grandmother, four young children, one young enough to be wheeled around in a stroller, and four other adults (sisters, brothers, cousins?). I counted twelve people in this group. The elderly members were wearing a traditional dress of the Indian subcontinent (it looked Punjabi or Muslim to me). The younger men were wearing jeans. The children had on cute outfits.

The language they were speaking was not English, and they certainly didn't communicating in English to the children.

It is becoming clearer and clearer that non-white immigrants have no intention of changing once they come to Canada. Bringing in elderly relatives from India, Pakistan or Bangladesh ensures that the youngest generation, most likely born in Canada, will continue their traditions. Of course, regular activities like going to school, and at work (unless it is one of those extended family Indian shops) will be in English and within a general Canadian tradition. But everything else, important things like family holidays, meals, weddings, etc., will always occur within an Indian context.

2). A white male and a Chinese/Asian female

I notice more and more a triumphant look in the Asian
(Chinese, Korean) females, and an insipid, overwhelmed
look in the white males of this couple type.

But, I wonder how long this will last? As I wrote in an
earlier blog, the women in high-powered Asian/White couples look
like they're in trouble. There is only so much "dragon"
men will take from women, after all.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chinese/white couplings look more assimilated, but an interesting development is that their half Asian offspring prefer their Asian background to their white one. When I was an art and design student, ALL the Asians students (Korean, Chinese and a few mixed) almost always associated with their Chinese/Asian background. Their works referenced their Asian background, some even traveling back to their ancestral homes to re-enforce this heritage. They did not have the slightest interest in Western art and design, and even mocked me when I said that those were my important influences.

A recent development is that this Asian/half Asian younger generation is coupling with each other, leaving whites out of the equation altogether. Another way that whites are being cast aside is that more and more Chinese/Korean Asians are coupling off with other non-whites: with Hispanics, blacks and Arabs.

3). Three Muslim women

Of Burquas and Shopping

These young women looked like they were in their early twenties, all burquad, but carrying fancy fashion shopping bags from the mall nearby. And I don't think they were buying halal groceries. They may look like they had an enjoyable day of shopping, but I don't think they will want to change their burqa fashion anytime soon.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Second and third generation Muslims appear to be "more Muslim" than their parents. But, I think this is inaccurate. When their parents immigrated to Canada, they still had to adhere superficially to the cultures and mores of the society. They did not abandon their cultural and religious backgrounds. Now, with exponentially increased numbers, and the policy of multiculturalism soundly in place, they can allow their children to show their true colors.

4). Conclusion

People are mostly happy with what they have. Coming to Canada doesn't mean they will change their ways and cultures, it just means they will bring these cultures with them. Canada is simply a real estate option, to set up house in good apartments, with good schools nearby (which are more than willing to accommodate to their requirements) and food and other amenities which cater to their needs. Then they can go about the important child rearing activities such as providing religious and cultural education to their non-white (non-Canadian) families.

Of course, what these single-minded immigrants don't see is that all these amenities were put in place by their white predecessors. Non-white immigrants are fleeing their failing countries to start afresh in Canada and the U.S. Once they have displaced whites, with high birth rates, in schools, with their religious institutions, with offspring who do not, and cannot, associate with white culture, what they will have is a North American version of the failed societies they left behind. They cannot fathom how their parasitic behavior affects their host countries, which, like true parasites, they have to destroy in order to live the only kind of life they know how to, and want to, live.

Read More...

^Top

Happy Fourth of July!

Fourth of July Cake, from Make My Cake in New York
[Image source: New York Post]

July 1 (dubbed Canada Day) doesn't come close to the holiday celebrated across the border."Happy Fourth of July!" really does evoke a holiday, in the middle of summer, with fireworks, barbecues, street festivals, and generally happy people, and of course independence.

But Lawrence Auster, at the View From the Right, presents a different perspective:

How can I—how can anyone—read the Declaration aloud this year in honor of American existence and American liberty? The colonies that were acting in unison as "one people," and in the act named themselves the United States of America, the free country that brought itself into existence with that Declaration on the basis of God-ordained limits on government power, has, as of June 28, 2012, officially come to an end. As a commenter at Lucianne.com has put it, "Think of Obamacare as the Declaration of Dependence."

The Declaration of Independence no longer represents what our country actually is. It represents our past country, and, perhaps, a future country. If we are to read the Declaration together, it can only be in that spirit, as patriotism to a non-existent country. As I said on the morning of June 28, patriotism to the United States as it actually exists "is simply subscription to, loyalty to, patriotism to, obedience to, a leftist unlimited state."

Wikipedia on Canada Day explains that:

Canada Day (French: Fête du Canada) is the national day of Canada, a federal statutory holiday celebrating the anniversary of the July 1, 1867, enactment of the British North America Act, 1867 (today called the Constitution Act, 1867, in Canada), which united three colonies into a single country called Canada within the British Empire. Originally called Dominion Day (French: Le Jour de la Confédération), the name was changed in 1982, the year the Canada Act* was passed. Canada Day observances take place throughout Canada as well as by Canadians internationally.

The operative word is "within the British Empire."

The first sentence on the Wikipedia entry on Canada tells us that:

Canada is a federal state governed as a parliamentary democracy and a constitutional monarchy, with Queen Elizabeth II as its head of state.

This ambiguous notion of independence brought about the awful multiculturalism, where a burqad, Muslim woman, jarring and alien to Canadian culture and history, can happily stand at a Canada Day "celebration" and talk about being a "Canadian."

But no country is immune to destructive forces, so I will cautiously wish Americans a Happy Fourth of July, but also heed them to pay close attention to those forces rising in their country.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*

The Canada Act 1982 (1982 c. 11) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that was passed at the request of the Canadian federal government to "patriate" Canada's constitution, ending the necessity for the country to request certain types of amendment to the Constitution of Canada to be made by the British parliament. The Act also formally ended the "request and consent" provisions of the Statute of Westminster 1931 in relation to Canada, whereby the British parliament had a general power to pass laws extending to Canada at its own request. [Source: Canada Act 1982, from Wikipedia]

Read More...

^Top

Smart Logos, Sordid Realities

Tiberge, the blogger at Gallia Watch who helps us "stay au courant of what French patriots are doing and saying," has posted an image of the logo for Pôle Emploie, the French government agency that registers the unemployed and helps them find work, alongside a photo of a disheveled individual running down some steps (second image above). I found the bigger image posted on Le Figaro. The out-of-focus photo of an Arab looking man interacting with what looks like an employment counselor (the fourth image) is from Le Nouvel Observateur. The others are in various news or blog sites, and more logo/people juxtapositions can be viewed here (many are strangely out of focus, but this photographic choice of image is probably to preserve anonymity and not to identify individuals - the racial background of some of these is hard to decipher).

This is a smart logo, carefully designed most certainly by a professional graphic designer, who must have put in quite a few hours and won over several competitive designs, to have his selected for the agency.

Yet, the sordid realities of French unemployment is juxtaposed next to this smart logo. The disheveled youth, the Muslim man, the black guy, the white girl with unkempt blond hair, are not smart enough for the logo.

And an even smarter photographer has taken the logo with a special effect which makes the image look as though it is splintering or breaking apart (bottom photo). An apt symbol for the over-loaded agency, and for France.

Read More...

^Top

Hijabed "Canadians" on Canada Day

Screen shot from CBC report "Canada Day on Parliament Hill"

This interview snippet starts at the 1 hour and 42 minutes point on the video, which is available here.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These were hijabed "Canadians" at Parliament Hill for the Canada Day festivities (the one at the far right is a Sikh). They were interviewed by a CBC reporter, and each spoke in perfect, unaccented, English. The interviewer introduced them with: "None of you girls were born here, but you love to Celebrate Canada Day. Tell me about one of your favorite Canada Day memories."

There is great prestige in "not being born here," but these hijabed girls clearly spent a large part of their life in Canada, from their perfect, unaccented English. It looks like they immigrated here as very young children, and any associations with "back there" are just nostalgic imagery propagated by their parents.

Research has shown that second generation immigrants from non-white backgrounds are assimilating less into Canadian society than previous white immigrants. These second generation immigrants seem even more "ethnic" than their parents. Muslim girls are now frequently seen fully robed in Islamic clothing, which even their parents are not donning.

I don't think this means these younger generation of immigrants are any more attached to their homelands. I think their parents were much more cautious about exhibiting their true identities when they first arrived, and tried to blend in as much as possible with the rest of Canada superficially. But, they were inculcating and teaching their children that their true identities lie elsewhere.

Now that multiculturalism has won, these same families can send their children to the forefront, to display and maintain their original cultures. Muslims are no different.

Read More...

^Top

The Wrath of the White Woman

Jeanne Darst

Elisha Lim, clearly an Asian writer at a website called Racialicious, writes:

The Valentine’s Day show [of NPR's This American Life], however, pushed me to new levels of downright rage. It's a series of stories all about the mishaps of love, and in the last, 12-minute segment, writer Jeanne Darst describes her outrage when she discovers that her boyfriend is cheating on her.

Lim quotes Darst's angst with a derisive "How does a white woman claim to be the victim of yellow fever?"

Here is what Darst writes about the man she started dating (taken from the transcript of her NPR show This American Life which aired on February 10, 2012), and whose journal she found and started to read:

A[n]d his journal was right there. Right there...

I'd like to tell you that I had some hesitation about whether to open this thing up and read it. That I thought for even one single second about right and wrong. But I didn't...

And then I read that he did not have an attraction to-- page turn-- white women. White women like me.

I knew he had dated some Asian women and his ex-wife was Asian. He had Asian assistants, but I didn't think too much about it. I guess that's why I got Sunday.

Maybe it was my fault. I probably should have said right at the start of the relationship, I'm not Asian-- before anyone got hurt. Me. Before I got hurt...

I then read in the journal, "There are some real red flags with Jeanne."...

I got hurt. Redd Flaggs got hurt.

I don't think I'll ever read anyone's journal again. I never want to know what someone thinks of me in that kind of way ever again. It's too intense. I know I'm not Asian. I know I had reservations about Jake, instincts, which is why I read the journal.

Lam, an ethnocentric and antiwhite Asian woman, continues with her derision:

What about all the Asian women that date Darst’s boyfriend, without knowing that he’s more into their race than their selves? What about Asian women as a whole, who have to deal with yellow fever–with age-old stereotypes about their sexuality that reduce them to objects of someone else’s (white) desire? She somehow manages to depict herself as the main victim of Asian fetishization, and stews in self pity.

How does a white woman claim to be the victim of yellow fever? I know, it’s so absurd it’s funny. But she manages it, by denying the impact of racism, and replacing it with a spiteful sense of competition.

Lam describes herself as "blatantly promot[ing] the dignity and sex appeal of queer and trans people of colour " which means that she is one of those herself.

Still, "queer and trans" are minutely "sensitive" to "discrimination" so she is trying to help out her straight Asian sisters here.

But "a spiteful sense of competition" has the perfect ring of the convoluted excesses that minorities will go to express their entitlements. Rather than competition, they are getting a free ride.

And no-one will be on the side of the white woman: Not the white boyfriend who betrays them; the Asian female who has had her eye on him from early childhood; the Asian immigrant parents who are more than happy to have a white son-on-law and future half-Asian grand kids, who will be more Asian than white; and not the multi-culti climate that dominates Western countries these days.

She's on her own with this one. As I wrote in my recent blog Racial Multi-Culti Chic:

I am waiting for the wrath of white women who will some day have their multi-culti glaze removed from their eyes, as they realize that their men have been stolen away from them, and by the Asian "friend" who was around all the time.

She can feel rage at the Asian interlopers. But what about at her white men?

Read More...

^Top

Beauty Au Naturel

Constance Jabloski, September 2011

Joan Small, July 2011

Liu Wen, July 2011

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here are the three Estée Lauder models I blogged about in my last post Radical Multi-Culti Chic, where I was comparing the beauty (outer, no inner beauty here) of the three models.

Even without make-up, (or elaborate make-up), the white model still looks to most beautiful, followed by the black girl. I still don't see any beauty in the Asian model.

Read More...

^Top

Radical Multi-Culti Chic

Ad of Estée Lauder's Idealist Even Skintone Illuminator


Product Details for the Idealist Even Skintone Illuminator:

The first fast-acting Serum from Estée Lauder Research proven to dramatically reduce the look of uneven skintone:

- redness
- acne marks
- dark spots
- sun spots
- discolorations

Instantly: redness is reduced, skin looks fresh and radiant.

In just 2 weeks: 62% of women showed a significant improvement in skintone in a clinical test.

Over time: skin looks noticeably clearer and brighter, vibrant and more even-toned.

This intensive, yet gentle oil-free serum features powerful technologies to address the look of every key sign of uneven skintone:

- Triple-Optic Technology provides skin with a brighter, more luminous look from the very first application.
- CorrectTone Technology visibly reduces uneven skintone in 2 weeks, while anti-oxidants help prevent its re-appearance.

Imagine skin so incredibly clear, even-toned and radiant, you have nothing to hide.

Proven gentle and effective for all ethnicities. HOW TO USE

Apply on clean skin. Follow with your SPF moisturizer.
For maximum even skintone results, use AM and PM for the first 12 weeks, then continue with your regular Estée Lauder regimen, using Even Skintone Illuminator every AM.

If you use Advanced Night Repair at night, continue to apply it first, then follow with Even Skintone Illuminator

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I found Tom Wolfe's The Painted Wall at a second hand bookstore for $4.95 (compared to the $12 advertized in the websites of most retail book stores). None of the books salesmen, whether at Chapters, Coles or the second hand store, knew about the book. And I couldn't find (or the salesmen couldn't find) the lone copy that was listed in the big store databases.

"No-one reads Tom Wolfe anymore," I said disdainfully.

"He wrote a couple of fiction books," said one book expert, not to be outwitted.

"He's best known as a scathing critic of culture. Forget his fiction," I said.

I usually take my books to a favorite reading spot, somewhere where I can have a cup of coffee. This time, I went to a restaurant, which although it has loud music, is muffled by the very high ceilings. The nice waitress gave me a large seat, and took my order.

Well, I was right across from a couple which looked like it was in its early twenties. I should have read the signs. The girl was an attractive, well-groomed Chinese/Korean/Asian, and the guy was an unattractive white guy, who was overweight, badly groomed, and dressed sloppily in dirty sweats and baggy jeans. Yet another from my survey: "White unattractive guys with cute Asian girls." The girl was facing me while the guy had his back to me (and he never turned around once in my direction, even through the "interaction" that followed).

I should add that the Asian cuteness is over-rated, and I think white girls are by far the more beautiful, if we are to make a hierarchy of looks, with blacks coming second.


I have this theory that it is the Asian girls who run after the white guys, using their wiles in many ways, from their long permed hair (no Asian girl has naturally curly or wavy hair, and every Asian girl has long hair), their short-shorts that is the style-du-jour for the summer months (as I count short-short wearers, Asian girls far outnumber anyone else, at least here in Toronto), their ready smiles, and all-round more feminine ways. But, as I have noted, this "femininity" takes a back seat to a more belligerent temperament as the white male/Asian female relationship solidifies, i.e. the man is trapped.

Since Asians females aggressively shove in my face their alien, inter-racial couplings, i.e., muscling aside the traditional same-race relationships (Asian females are now more commonly with black males as well), I have no qualms about staring at such couples from where I am in the subway, at a cafe, or just standing at the sidewalk.

And I did so at this couple, although I was staring at the girl directly, and glancing at the back of the guy. The effect was interesting. The girl put on a terrified, trapped look on her face, and kept aggressively and cloyingly demanding the man's attention, from linking her arms with his, to rubbing his hands, to shaking her permed wavy hair back and forth. I didn't stop staring. I decided that they have a few choices in order to "deal" with my behavior. The guy can come and confront me, like a true "man," then we can have a real mano a mano; he can call the wait staff, then I can call the manager and tell them I've done absolutely nothing wrong; they can continue as they are; they can stop; or they can leave.

They chose mid-way between stopping and continuing, egged on by the Asian girl. She smiled, she scowled, she frowned, and finally, when the the dry seriousness of it hit her, she put on a terrified look.

Then, I just smiled, picked up my book and read my few chapters. All the waiters/waitresses were nice to me. One took so long to take my order (it was a busy afternoon) that I caught him rushing by and he served me with his profuse apologies. Another forgot my bill, so I asked him to bring it, for which he profusely apologized. Another sent me to the wrong exit, for which he profusely apologized, and set me to the right directions. I wasn't some loony, and the wait staff was on my side (I made sure of that). I left with a chorus of their goodbyes, and my demure smile from behind my shoulder.

The hand-clinging couple, with the petrified Asian girl, continued with its pathetic public display of I-don't-know-what, knowing (at least the girl) that someone doesn't find it cute.

I should add that I don't really find anything wrong with public displays of affection between couples. I think, though, they should be discreet and as private as possible. Or, lovers should be on the romantic bridges of Paris, with a beautiful sunset as the backdrop to a silhouette of the many lovely buildings around the Seine, which would make them romantic and demonstrative and not not lewd and clingy.

But there is something creepy about seeing public demonstrations of terrified affection between a white guy and an Asian female.

Still, a bar/restaurant in a mall doesn't capture any romance for anyone, and in fact it is simply a place to have a decent meal, to have some conversation (if the music allows), and to leave.

I read some funny sections from my small book, had my quick snack, paid my bill and tip, and left. The "couple" stayed with its footsies and carb-filled dinner.

I am waiting for the wrath of white women who will some day have their multi-culti glaze removed from their eyes, as they realize that their men have been stolen away from them, and by the Asian "friend" who was around all the time.

Read More...

^Top

When the Going Gets Tough, Just Stick Post-Its

Post-Its at the Eaton Center
[Photo by KPA]

I took the above photo of the Eaton Centre entrance earlier today, because I was curious to see all those "notes" stuck on the entrance by concerned Torontonians about the recent gang-related murder that occurred in the downstairs food court.

What a pathetic site. I didn't bother to read any of the "notes" as I took the photo, but it is clear that people took this "effort" seriously. People who, I would wager, wouldn't even want to bring up the race of the killer and the targeted victim (both black), during whose melee other innocent bystanders also died or were injured.

Rather than confront the issue of racial warfare, and its spillover into the rest of society right in the middle of the city, which means addressing black criminality, these "concerned" citizens resort to notes on yellow squares.

Here are a couple of especially original ones:

Read More...

^Top

Feng Shui With A Hole In It

Feng Shui With A Hole In It

One of my (few) forays into the land of television is a design show called Love It or List It. It is actually a real estate show. One member of the two-person team, Hilary, is in charge of renovating a house for a family, while the other, David, tries to convince the family that their house cannot be salvaged (the way they want it) and they are better off finding a new home.

I often agree with the designer Hilary. Many of these homes are nice, some even great. They may have some idiosyncrasies, but what home doesn't? Often, the cost of renovating/refurbishing is much less then buying a new home. And often, the type of home David finds for them, that they can afford, is of a lower value and quality than the home they hope to leave.

Recently there was a Chinese couple which gave both Hilary and David a difficult time (to say the least). Both Hilary and David worked in a spectacularly creative fashion to give this couple exactly what they wanted: a home that followed all the rules and regulations of Feng Shui, with only a little over budget.

As I watched the show, I began to get the impression that many of these requirements are arbitrary and superstitious (and superstitions is up there with arbitrariness).

I cannot find the video, but here is a link which describes some of their "requirements."

Helen and Andrew Yee have lived in their large suburban home for 15 years. It was perfect when they bought it because it followed the Feng Shui principles of good energy flow. But the good energy came to a halt when the 3 kids came along highlighting a lack of bathrooms, poor sightlines, and an 80's main floor. Helen loves her house and wants to fix it, but Andrew wants a larger home and wants to move on. Will Hilary's renovations be able to wow this family into staying or will David take them away to a larger home that meets all the Feng Shui criteria?

The show was excruciating. Hilary came up with some good designs, and David found great houses for good deals. But, each effort was not good enough. Or there wasn't enough money to pay for the exact requirements.

From the quote above, and from watching the show, the decisions of this family was clearly not a Feng Shui thing, but based much more on what they wanted. They even got a non-English-speaking, Chinese mother-in-law to give her expert advice. She moved her hands around to show her displeasure or demands, but it wasn't clear what she wanted, or if it corresponded with what the couple was asking for.

So superstition, layered on top of fantasy demands, made this show a study in impossible clients. If I were part of it, I would have found a quick way out. "Find your own Feng Shui," I would have said - politely, of course. "Or go back to China where you can find a whole country revolving around Feng and Shui."

The other interesting thing about this couple is that they both had perfect, Canadian English (the program is a Canadian show). This means that they either were born here, or moved to Canada as very young children. "What do they really know about Feng Shui?" was my first question. My second observation was that Chinese families, even two or three generations down, don't really change. Or they accommodate their new surroundings to fit their cultural and belief systems.

So much for an integrated, multi-culti society, with people from the far concerns of the world calling themselves "Canadian" yet having no desire to fit into Canada's traditions, or any real desire to know much about them, and who will keep on propagating their own alien worlds. And the nice, pleasant and accommodating Hilary and David (how Canadian!) let them!

So back to my questions from the list above:

- What does a lack of bathrooms because of a growing family have to do with Feng Shui?

- How could the house have "good energy" when they first bought it, but no longer does.

- How did they not notice the non-fengshuiness of the staircase, the husband's office, the children's bedrooms sans bathrooms, etc., when they first bought the house?

- Why did the kitchen no longer had bad Feng Shui after Hilary gave them a beautifully remodeled kitchen, with a modern stove and appliances, without changing the "fire shouldn't be beside water" criteria?

- Why did they agree on the origninal plans (albeit on paper), but made a fuss when they saw the changes (as above)? Can they not read plans?

- With all the demands they made, how cannot they understand the very high costs they incurred?

- Etc.

Here is an interesting blog, where the writer returned from a trip to China, and found it full of superstitions. Here is one comment he makes:

A lot of the superstitions centre around wealth and the desire to make money.

This weird animal thing is a Pixiu. It is a Chinese mythical hybrid creature resembling a winged lion.

It likes to eat gold and silver. Unfortunately for the animal, it doesn’t have an anus. So what it eats stays inside (I’m not sure why it can’t throw up).

This is great for humans. If they have a Pixiu it will bring wealth to the owner that cannot escape...

Our guide informed us that they are a gambler’s favourite lucky charm. And you can’t just own one. You have to make it yours. You have to perform a ceremony. She informed us (in all seriousness) that once purchased you have to soak it in warm water for 10 minutes (to wake it up?) and then take it out and look into it’s eyes. Then it becomes your Pixiu and will help you win lots of money when you go to the bookies.

Yes, once an inanimate piece of stone has been carved into a Pixiu shape by someone and then “trained” by the owner, it will make the owner rich.

It is a well known fact that all bookies in China are broke as every gambler owns a Pixiu and they just keep winning. ;)...
And, of course, the ultimate superstition: Feng Shui. Even the skyscrapers are designed with Feng Shui in mind...

The building [below] must be positioned so that it has water in front of it (for food) and a mountain behind it (for protection). But then how will the dragon that lives in the mountain go about it’s business if you put a big building in front of it? Simple. Put a big hole in your big building for it to fly through.

Read More...

^Top

Julie Chen's Anti-White Woman, Multi-Culti Talk Show - With Attitude

L-R: Black, Jewish/Lesbian, Jewish/Brit, Black, Asian
Who has the most "black attitude?"

In my previous post The Chinese Women/White Men Epidemic, I neglected to emphasize, although it should be clear from my presentation, that Julie Chen's failing show The Talk has a panel without a straight, white, American woman. The straight, white, American women she has (or had) on her show have some Jewish ancestry. Leah Remini is half Jewish from her mother's side and both parents of Marissa Winokur are Jewish.

Remini claims that she was fired from the original The Talk panel (here are her comments on her firing). Perhaps Remini's outspoken and boisterous Jewishness was just too much for Chen to handle, as she was often in contradiction to Chen's views and beliefs. Winokur, who seemed to have left the show on relatively good terms, nevertheless complained that there was "no time" for some of the segments she had planned (how can there be no time for a "Mom in the Street" segment?). Here are Winokur's complaints.

The lesbian Sara Gilbert is Jewish from both her parents. Chen chose her, and keeps her on her show, because she is the antithesis of the straight, white woman. Whatever she says or does will have no affinity for the straight, white woman.

Sharon Osbourne traces her Jewish identity through her father, which would not technically make her Jewish since the transfer of the Jewish racial and ethnic identity is through a Jewish mother, but she provides that diluted, superficial, ethnic Jewish mix to Chen's panel.

Chen is married to white/Jewish CBS CEO Les Moonves, so her Jewish affinity is personal. Yet, these authentic (or closer to the authentic) Jews on her show probably remind her that her own race has no association with theirs, and she can never be Jewish (or white). So why does Chen "act black" on her show, rather than Asian, white, Jewish or gay? I will try to answer that below.

Chen has filled her current panel with two new blacks. This time, she made sure that they would be the kind that would toe the line, unlike the no nonsense Holly Robinson Peete from the original panel, who says she was fired (along with Remini) for her outspokenness. These new panelists are desperate, forgotten black actresses who are trying to make a comeback on television. One is Sheryl Underwood, who is a relatively unknown stand-up comedian, and the other is Aisha Tyler, a second rate T.V. personality and actress who is mainly cast in supporting roles. Tyler is married to a white man, and is less of a "militant" black, and diffuses some of Underwood's belligerence. There are now two blacks on The Talk, one up from Robinson Peete, and make 40% of the current panel.

I recently watched the excruciation show, with Chen's untalented reign (and reins) lacking any humor, style or charisma. Then Chen suddenly started talking black, shaking her head and wiggling her index figure with "black attitude." Underwood, the black comedian, had a pleased expression on her face, clearly happy that her boss shows her solidarity by "turning black" once in a while. Tyler, the other black panelist, sat clueless and unaware of Chen's antics. Osbourne cackled with approval. I turned the TV off.

I think "acting black" is the the best strategy Chen can use to undermine, if not ignore, her adversaries: straight, white women. After all, she married one of their men. By siding with blacks around the common theme of white antagonism, she gains the trust and friendship of blacks, and can thus evade having to deal with white women. But this evasion is probably affecting her show's unpromising ratings, since it is white women who drive up the ratings of afternoon shows.

Acting lesbian (those other "haters" of straight, white women) would turn the fierce homosexual lobby against her. Any mimicry of gays by straights, however much filled with good intentions, could be a recipe for homosexual wrath. Chen cleverly avoids this ugly reaction (who knows what could set it off) partly by having a token homosexual (the lesbian Gilbert) on the show, and by promoting gay-friendly programs. And I doubt that Chen, as a straight woman, would want to have her sexuality questioned ("anyone" can turn gay, but one is born into one's race), so she won't go further than having a lesbian co-host and gay-friendly programs to avoid any stir up concerning her own sexual identity. She is not going to "act lesbian."

Chen flatters blacks by having two black panelists out of five on her show. And this enables her to "act black" all she wants. But this is filled with pot holes also, since she can never predict what could set off the wrath of blacks. But someone as clever as Chen can assiduously gauge how far she can go, and put limits to her "blackness."

Unlike turning into a lesbian, Chen can never be black, so she needn't fear losing her non-black identity or have it questioned while "acting black," as she might have her sexuality questioned if she "acted gay." So she can "act black" in superficial solidarity with all those blacks out there. And, since about half her panel is made of black women, her black critics would be more lenient with her impersonations, not taking insult, and even being charmed by her attempts. She's doing all she can to appease them, after all.

A white woman's head-shaking, finger-waving antics will never be appreciated by blacks (unless she humbles and prostrates herself repeatedly and humiliatingly, and even then she might only get mixed reviews), since she comes from that line of people who enslaved, then oppressed blacks. She is, and will always be, a racist, and cannot remove that blemish no matter how much she tries. And any white woman who "acts" white would be deemed a superior elitist (and, here we go again, racist), and would be shunned, mocked or even attacked. So, white women have always to downplay their (natural) whiteness. And of course, white women have become so defeatist, that they have also stopped defending themselves, and have come to accept (and even believe) the anti-white rhetoric and sentiment that surrounds them, and they readily take on these identity-effacing roles.

Chen, the Asian, plays around with all these dynamics like a pro.

Such is the war that is being waged on the West, where its multicultural population is aggressively dismantling it at its core.

Read More...

^Top

The Chinese Women/White Men Coupling Epidemic

L-R: Les Moonves, Rupert Murdoch and Mark Zuckerberg
With their current wives

Murdoch Wives: (L-R) Patricia Booker and Anna Murdoch
Right: Nancy Wiesenfeld-Moonves

It was hard to find photos of Nancy Wiesenfeld-Moonves, but I was struck by her delicate beauty, compared with the "Dragon Lady" look of Julie Chen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The blog title uses strong language, but how can we (I) not comment on this phenomenon? These days, I see several white male/Asian female couples a day. It is intriguing why this is so. My theory is that white women are getting difficult to be around, partly because of feminism, and partly because white women are by nature more outspoken than Asians (which I think makes white women, sans the feminism, ideal companions for white men, since they become good sounding boards and encouragers of the adventuress spirit of white men).

The Asian women, as I've observed, appear more docile when with white men. But two of the loudest public arguments I heard in a street were between an Asian woman and a white man. I think this docility is an initial step towards "getting" the white man. But it is also a sustained camouflage throughout the relationship and even marriage (which must be really difficult to sustain, especially for the "feminist" minded, Westernized Asian women, and hence the arguments I was privy to in public). It is also a kind of passive aggressive competitiveness to draw white men away from white men. And why white men? I think it is a status/material thing. White men are more likely to provide better qualities of life for their families than Asian men would.

I've spoken (not written) about the materialistic inclination of Asian women vis-à-vis white men. I don't know if these Asian women (whether "Westernized"/Western-born or immigrant Asians) really love their white men, or if their primary instinct is to find the best provider around. And the best provider around is clearly (still) the white man. Of course, all women want men who can provide for them and take care of them, but the spiritual and love element in mating seems to me to be less so in Asian women (and Asian men too). I will try to investigate on this further. Asian forums and boards are often the best places to go, and I have so far found some evidence to support my thoughts that there is less romantic love in the couplings of Asians. So, more on this later, since I think that besides the interracial component, the materialistic component of Asian culture has profound implications for our civilization.

Several high profile white men have taken up Asian wives. They often divorce their first, white wives, to marry the Asian women. Media Mogul Rupert Murdoch, CBS Chairman Les Moonves, and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg have Asian wives. Murdoch and Les Moonves both divorced their first, white, wives before marrying their second, Asian, wives, although both had affairs with the Asian women while still married to their first wives. Mark Zuckerberg skipped the white wife period, since marrying an Asian woman is no longer a social anomaly, but it will be interesting to see how his marriage fares with his Westernized and Western-born Chinese-American wife.

Below is some background on these men and their wives. I'm not saying that there is necessarily a direct association between character flaw and marrying out of one's race (and specifically marrying an Asian woman), but it is interesting that all three of these high-profile men behaved in dubious ways, using their prominent careers to advance their status.

1. Mark Zuckerberg

Zuckerberg may have built the most successful "social networking" site, yet Facebook is getting known for exposing the private information of its users. Of course, those who post private information on a public website (albeit with "friends" restrictions) deserve what they get. But, this is worse than that. Facebook participants, with the support of Zuckerberg and his group, "flame" users whose comments they don't like, and even spread their names and comments to their professional and personal contacts.

Here's what one user Safari Man has to say, from Lucianne.com:

I do believe people will eventually realize how dangerous (or at least disadvantageous) it can be to publish all sorts of personal details for the world to see. I cancelled by FaceBook account immediately upon learning they send a message to all my friends and told them how I voted on a poltical poll. Bad, bad, bad. Many people are going to find they cannot get a good job, or will at least lose friends. There have been murders spraked by FaceBook content. Our society hasn't yet learned the downsides.

Zuckerberg is an arrogant snot for not showing some respect. I was offered IPO shares and declined -- do not want to have anything to do with this punk.

And on a technical note, this is what user joew9 has to say, following the same Lucianne.com conversation:

I finally gave up [on Facebook] last night in utter frustration and decided to deactivate my account. I spent another 30 minutes just trying to figure out how to do it. The whole thing has become a kluge of features with no cohesive flow. It needs to be re-written into a simple interface. Especially one that informs the user just what is going to happen with a post or a like click. The friends list appears to be just random instead of alphabetical. You should be able to organize friends into groups. When you send a post you should be able to control in a very clear manner exactly who gets to see it. When you click Like you should be able to control exactly who gets to see it. You should be able to click on something and see exactly how your page looks to friends, non-friends, members of friend groups, etc. I'm done with this GUI. Apple needs to create a replacement. They write excellent GUIs. Even Microsoft would be better. With all the money facebook has you would think they would hire someone to write a decent GUI.

- Priscialla Chan, Zuckerberg's wife

She influenced his interest in China
Zuckerberg's wife, who is Chinese-American, is fluent in English, Spanish and Cantonese, according to the Daily Beast.

In 2010, he started studying Chinese to prepare for a trip to China with Chan, who has some family in China, he told Oprah Winfrey at the time. Though he didn't become fluent, he was able to at least communicate with his bride-to-be's grandmother.

2. Les Moonves

From Trendsbuzz.com:

In April 2003, Nancy Moonves [Les Moonves' wife] filed for divorce in L.A. Superior Court, citing irreconcilable differences, according to her lawyer Dennis Wasser. Nancy and Les Moonves were already living apart.

In 2004, although his divorce from Nancy was not yet finalized, Les Moonves began dating CBS' The Early Show reporter Julie Chen. On December 10, 2004, Moonves got a court to grant an early divorce. Tired of waiting, Moonves' motion cited a "desire to return to the status of being single". Moonves foresaw a lengthy trial to settle the property and other issues. He argued that "terminating the marital status will aid in promoting settlement of this matter", and the judge gave his request the stamp of approval—leaving the divorce's alimony, child support and property division details to be determined later—so he could remarry. Just thirteen days later in Mexico, he married television and news personality Julie Chen.

- Julie Chen, Moonves' wife

Moonves, who is CEO of CBS, the channel which hosts his wife's Julie Chen's day time program The Talk, which is a copy of the popular and unpleasant The View, and said half jokingly, "I love my wife so much, and if this doesn't work I'll cancel you." Chen herself reiterated to her staff, mincing no words, "My husband can fire your asses, any day." Even Barbara Walters didn't use her "connections" to half-threaten her crew with crass "I'll fire you" jokes.

Chen did end up firing two talented members of her original panel: actresses Leah Remini (Jewish/Italian) and Holly Robinson (black), who probably wouldn't toe the line. Marissa Jaret Winokur, the talented Jewish stage actress who plays the overweight Tracy Turnblad in the Hairspray musical, left with the statement "there really wasn't room for my segments," which included "Mom in the Street."

Chen did refill her multicultural panel (that is part of the show's point, to showcase the wonderful "diversity" that is out there). She brought on board the uninteresting and unintelligent black woman comedian Sheryl Underwood, and the relatively unknown black actress Aisha Tyler.

The current "panel" and crew of The Talk is:

- Sara Gilbert: a lesbian activist actress who talks about "my ex-girlfriend" and "my children" on the show. Her "children" were clearly born via artificial insemination of some kind. This website describes her two children as: "Each of them [Gilbert and then "girlfriend" Allison Adler] is the biological mother of one of the children."

Gilbert is listed as "Executive Producer" and "creator" of the show, and chose all the original panelists, including asking Chen to be the "head." This was a clever way of running the show without losing all those viewers who would be repulsed by her "lifestyle" and her lack of charisma if she had been its "spokes 'person.'" The show also gives her a sounding board, which she has used very effectively, to proclaim her various "lifestyle" choices, including having children while in a homosexual relationship.

- Sharon Osbourne: the foul-mouthed British import who is making the rounds on American TV talk shows.

- Sheryl Underwood: a black, "Republican," stand-up comedian, who nonetheless seems to support many of the ultra-liberal positions of the show, including accepting to be on the show with a lesbian, "mother" of two, co-host.

- Aisha Tyler: a relatively unknown black TV personality and actress. Chen/Gilbert probably brought her on board because of her interracial marriage, in accordance with the liberal "equality" mantra.

- Manny Rodriguez: the Hispanic director of The Talk who won "Best Long Form Video"Latin Grammy for directing the music video of homosexual Latin star Ricky Martin.

Below is a review of the show's ratings after the "shake-up" (or "shake-down" which might better describe the show's activities):

...The Talk ratings in July (1.9 average) and up slightly from the last in-season month in May (1.7 average). So no big audience surge for the new Talk panel, but no drop off either

These numbers belie The Talk's relatively low average of 1.83 million viewers per episode, compared with 4.42 million for The View. This gives some credence to the rumors out there that Moonves is financing The Talk to help his wife's career move along.

The original panel of The Talk:
L-R: British TV personality Sharon Osbourne, Jewish actress Marissia Winokur Lesbian Actress Sara Gilbert, Italian/Hispanic Leah Remini, Asian TV personality Julia Chen, and black actress Holly Robinson

Current panel of The Talk:
L-R: Sheryl Underwood, Sara Gilbert, Sharon Osbourne,
Aisha Tyler, Julie Chen

3. Rupert Murdoch

Probably to biggest and latest public figure scandal is surrounding Rupert Murdoch. Here is a brief description of his recent activities:

In July 2011 Murdoch faced allegations that his companies, including the News of the World, owned by News Corporation, had been regularly hacking the phones of celebrities, royalty and public citizens. He faces police and government investigations into bribery and corruption by the British government and FBI investigations in the US.[Source: Wikipedia

- Wendi Deng, Murdoch's wife:

When her family relocated to Guangzhou in southern China, she changed her name to Wen Di, enrolled in medical school but quit, and then befriended an American family, the Cherrys. Like her own father, Jake Cherry was a factory manager and an engineer. Wendi learned English from him and his wife, Joyce. Their friendship grew and the Cherrys agreed to sponsor the 19-year-old Chinese woman to come to the U.S. for undergrad courses at California State University in Northridge. There Wendi lived with the Cherrys, sometimes sharing a room with their young daughter. She eventually moved out, and two years later, in 1990, married Jake, who by that time had divorced Joyce. After a marriage that lasted long enough for Wendi to obtain her U.S. green card, Wendi divorced Jake, who is three decades her senior. (Jake had discovered she was having an affair with a younger man, David Wolf, whom Wendi later married but later divorced as well.)

Wikipedia continues about her relationship with Murdoch:

...17 days after divorcing his second wife, Murdoch, then aged 68, married Chinese-born Deng Wendi (Wendi Deng). She was 30, a recent Yale School of Management graduate, and a newly appointed vice-president of his STAR TV. Murdoch has two children with her.

I am not one to speculate, but the data shows that there must have been something going on before the "divorce," which implies that this activity could have been the cause of the divorce. In any case, Deng's "activities" tell us enough about her. Here is a quote from Anna Murdoch, his second (white) wife:

I think that Rupert's affair with Wendi Deng –- it's not an original plot –- was the end of the marriage [with Anna Murdoch]. His determination to continue with that.

Read More...

^Top

My First Insights into Conservatives, Back in 2009

My background isn't politics. It is a fairly recent interest. I got to it in a round about way, as I began to try to understand why art and design have deteriorated in our age.

So below is a rather astute, if I may say that about myself, observation back in 2009, in a forum I used to post on, hosted by David Yeagley.

The "conversation" at some point revolves around a disruptive forum participant. It is a pleasant group, we "LOL" a lot, and seem to respect each other. The disruptive participant was basically run off the forum, or more precisely, she couldn't handle the demands on her to provide logical, credible and interesting points, and left of her own will.

I also left shortly after, not because I was "run off" but because I found the topics to be too Indian-centric (although that is the prerogative of the site after all), but also erroneously critical of white culture, and whites in general. I found from the site and the discussions all the "Indian Wisdom" I needed to show me that Indians haven't really accommodated to, nor accepted, Western society and culture, and will for ever be living in their enclaves, despite the great lengths whites have gone to make their lives easier and to integrate into society at large.

Here is what I say about conservatives:

I remember saying a long time ago that Nora Brinker [the forum participant who left] was not really a conservative. It's a long story, but it's in the forums somewhere.

The problem is that conservatives have shifted ground so much that they have gotten closer and closer to liberals.

Hard to tell who is who anymore, except to say that people are more liberal than conservative these days.

Read More...

^Top

Quebec Style Fascism

Nadeau-Dubois, the fascist with the almost-angelic face

[The above photo is posted at the Globe and Mail. I think it is a great portrait. We can see Nadeau-Dubois' arrogant superiority in his expression. The rock behind him, which symbolizes his unrelenting, stubborn position, looks bright on his half, but the other half is dark and foreboding, giving us a glimpse of his character and position.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quebec's student "revolt" looked like the whining of spoiled brats, but it is becoming much larger than that.

At one time, Quebeckers marched on their streets to try to achieve some modicum of independence. But they always tried to latch on to Canada in some way, and their "independence" quest was never a complete detachment from Canada, but something that would give them their own "identity" under the umbrella of a larger Canada. They, in effect, demanded all the "good" things from Canada, while obtaining what they wanted: Their own independent French culture to thrive alongside English Canada.

This perspective has rubbed off in a big way on the newest generation of Quebec's demonstrators. The marches are their dissatisfaction at how they are being billed for their university education. Here's some background on these protest marches, dubbed as "strikes" by the media [Source The National Post]:

The Quebec Liberal government wanted to increase tuition fees at post-secondary schools by $1,625 over five years. The hike worked out to $325 per year, although the government has since offered to modify the increase to $1,775 over seven years. In an attempt to assuage demonstrators, the government explained the hike works out to 50 cents per day after factoring in the tuition fee tax credit...

Striking student groups...argue tuition fees in other provinces are already too high, and Quebec’s increase would erect another barrier to education...

Even if the tuition hike goes through, Quebec students will still have cheaper fees than any other province in Canada. For the 2011/2012 school year, Canadian undergraduates paid an average of $5,366 in tuition, according to Statistics Canada.

B.C.: $4,852
Alberta: $5,662;
Saskatchewan: $5,601
Manitoba: $3,645
Ontario: $6,640
New Brunswick: $5,853
Nova Scotia: $5,731
Prince Edward Island: $5,258
Newfoundland and Labrador: $2,649
Quebec: $2,168

[...]

CLASSE (Coalition large de l’association pour une solidarite syndicale etudiante), a group that represents about half the students on strike, is ultimately pushing for free, universal access to post-secondary education.

Quebec students currently pay about half of what other Canadian students pay on average.

The official news describes this "movement" as being the organization of a few "radical" groups. Yet, we saw thousands of students on the streets of Montreal, which hardly constitutes a "radical" group. Granted, there is a small, violent component to these demonstrations, but its members would not be doing all the violent protests, including physical damage to buildings and streets, if the majority doesn't allow them to continue. However quiet and "civilized" the majority seems, it is accepts the radical component of its movement.

I saw an interview of the leader of this group. He has small stature, delicate features and a quiet voice. But his language is frighteningly violent. He is a true fascist. His name is Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois. Here is a brief background on him:

With his private-school education and generous university scholarship, Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois is hardly your typical struggling student. But as the Quebec student strike over tuition fee increases drags on, the telegenic 21-year-old history major has become the most prominent face of the protest movement...

[H]is writings and speeches leave little doubt that he sees himself waging a battle not just to keep university cheap but also to overturn the economic order. In an April 7 speech, which he began with his fist raised in the air, Mr. Nadeau-Dubois declared that the student strike has “indelibly marked” Quebec history...

Speaking following a protest outside Premier Jean Charest’s Montreal office Tuesday, Mr. Nadeau-Dubois said that his fiery speeches are meant to convey the message that "this struggle is not strictly for students but is part of a broader struggle."...

In editorials in the organization’s newspaper, Ultimatum, Mr. Nadeau-Dubois clearly staked out his position as far back as 2010.

"From today, from tomorrow, and every day until 2012, the resistance will be more firm and the indignation will rumble more," he wrote. "The pressure tactics will increase along with students’ anger, with the anger of the entire Quebec people: disruptions of MNAs offices, economic disruptions, national protests, etc. And this until the government backs down."

I've said before, privately and publicly, the only solution to the Quebec problem is to isolate the province and remove it from the Canadian confederation. No alliances, economic unions, half-hearted political compromises. The consequence of this compromise and accommodation has been characters like Nadeau-Dubois, with their endless incitements of marches and demonstrations, which could very well turn to regional civil unrest at some point in the future.

Simply say to them: 'You're on your own. Welcome to the North America." Let fascists like Nadeau-Dubois deal with the consequences.

Read More...

^Top

Hitler's Manhood

Time Magazine's issue of Hitler as Man of the Year

[Large image here, Click on linked image to magnify further]

The caption reads:

Man of 1938
From the Unholy Organist, a hymn of Hate

The illustration shows:

Organist Adolf Hitler playing his hymn of hate in a desecrated cathedral while victims dangle on a St. Catherine's wheel and the Nazi hierarchy looks on, was drawn by Baron Rudolph Charles von Ripper (see p. 20), a Catholic who found Germany intolerable.

The illustration is by Baron Rudolph Charles von Ripper [text of linked article is small, but the biography is the most complete I can find online]

Hitler on the cover of Time:
Top - Left: 1931, Right: 1933
Bottom - Left: 1936, Right: 1941

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A couple of days ago, the T.V. game show Jeopardy asked who was the Time Magazine Man of the Year for 1938 as its final question. Guess, if you don't know.

Unbelievably it was Hitler.

By 1938, there was enough information coming out of Germany to paint a viscous picture of Hitler's ambitions and rise to power, including his invasions of Czechoslovakia and Poland.

Below is a review of Hitler as he attains the leadership of the Nazi Party to his death by suicide in 1945.

On November 8th, 1923, Hitler, the leader of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, or the Nazi Party for short, marched with 2,000 Nazis to disrupt a meeting at the Munich Beer Hall (known as the Beer Hall Putsch) to spark a "revolution." This failed. The following morning, Hitler and about 3,000 Nazis marched in Munich to take over the entire city. This was averted by the police. Hitler was arrested two days later at his hiding place in the attic of friends. He served only one of his five-year term. He wrote most of his Mein Kampf treatise while in prison. The book was published in two volumes in 1925 and 1926. There was no doubt what he thought about, and intended for, the "Jewish Question." In 1933, he was elected Chancellor of Germany by popular vote. In 1936, his government hosted the summer Olympic Games in Berlin, a prestigious recognition of his country by the world at large.

Hiter's aggressive leadership, his clear-cut anti-Semitism, his nationalistic politics to bring Germany to the forefront of Europe through Nazism, and his expansionary goals, were ignored or undermined by world leaders, despite enough (I could say ample) evidence.

The January 2 1939 edition of Time Magazine named him Man of the Year for 1938, as a world figure who "for better or for worse, ...has done the most to influence the events of the year." This ambiguous honor gave some legitimacy to Hitler's leadership by the world at large.

Here is more from the 1939 article in the magazine, describing Hitler:

[T]he figure of Adolf Hitler strode over a cringing Europe with all the swagger of a conqueror. Not the mere fact that the Führer brought 10,500,000 more people (7,000,000 Austrians, 3,500,000 Sudetens) under his absolute rule made him the Man of 1938...More significant was the fact Hitler became in 1938 the greatest threatening force that the democratic, freedom-loving world faces today.

In March 1938, Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia. On September 1, 1939, Hitler invaded Poland. On September 3, 1939, Britain and France declared war on Germany, but with no military action against Germany. Hitler then invaded Norway and Denmark, and launched his blitzkrieg on Holland, Belgium and France by 1940. Churchill, who became Prime Minister of Britain in 1940, led the British to war against Germany with his June 1940 "Finest Hour" speech, and his famous line:

"I expect that the Battle of Britain is about to begin."

The Americans joined soon after, in December 1941

Hitler stayed in power from 1933 until the defeat of the Nazis in 1945. He had managed to convince the German people to elect him as their leader despite his aggressive and destructive coup on the German government more than ten years earlier. His stint in prison was forgotten. His book, Mein Kampf, failed to alert the public of his true intentions. His invasions were initially downplayed by foreign nations. News, reports, and perhaps more importantly anecdotes by Jewish dissidents to America on this treatment of Jews in Germany, including stories of Jews being rounded up for labor/concentration camps, were ignored or downplayed.

On November 9, 1938, his SA stormtroopers conducted two days of destruction and pogrom on Jewish neighborhoods using as a pretext the shooting of a German Embassy staff in Paris by Herschel Grynszpan, a young Jewish student. Grynszpan was retaliating against the deportation of his parents from Germany to Poland. Although the international community condemned this Germany-wide pogrom, or Kristallnacht as it is known, some by cutting off diplomatic relation with Germany, Hitler suffered no serious consequences. The world didn't take his clearly displayed Jewish animosity as a precursor to his impending aggressions.

Hitler himself said in a public speech in January 1939:

"If international-finance Jewry inside and outside Europe should succeed once more in plunging the nations into yet another world war, the consequences will not be the Bolshevization of the earth and thereby the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation (vernichtung) of the Jewish race in Europe."

His speech was included in

the 1940 Nazi propaganda movie The Eternal Jew (Der ewige Jude), whose purpose was to provide a rationale and blueprint for eliminating the Jews from Europe. [Source: Wikipedia]

It would take Britain and France another eight months after Time's honor of Hitler before they would declare war on Germany, and another nine months before Winston Churchill would lead the fight.

I don't think there is a Hitler analogy in our era, and I sincerely hope there never will be. Yet, I keep coming back to the Muslim presence in the West. We may never have a Muslim leader in a Western country like Canada or the US since Muslim culture is just too different from Western culture. But we have enough multicultural propagandists and liberal equality mongers who work around the clock to convince the public that Muslims in our countries are part of that wonderful, peaceable smorgasbord of peoples, and that letting more of them into our liberated, free and equal lands should be part of our mission. Soon, Muslim will have built up a mass that will work in tandem to wreak real havoc on our societies, and not with just the occasional bombs that blow apart buildings and people.

Sam Solomon, a former Sharia expert and converted Christian, seems to have similar ideas to mine. I discuss here his book Modern Day Trojan Horse: Al-Hijra, The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration, Accepting Freedom or Imposing Islam? on Islamization and the Umma. Below is an excerpt from his book:

The beginning phase of Islamization usually includes activities pivotal to building a physical presence. It consists of public calls to prayer; founding of schools, libraries and research centers; and the teaching of Arabic -- actions that appear to be reasonable and respectable infrastructure requirements necessary to support the presence of a faith. At this point in the Hijra ["immigration designed to subvert and subdue non-Muslim societies and pave the way for eventual, total Islamization"], it is permissible for Muslims to engage in haram, or forbidden actions, out of necessity to establish and empower the umma or Muslim community. Koranic rules such as the prohibition against friendships with infidels are suspended while the objectives of future Islamization are systematically put into place. In its initial phase, the Hijra passes scrutiny by the West whose citizens erroneously view the migration as mainly economic -- a pilgrimage for a better life.

Just as the Nazis prepared the German people over the years about the evilness of the Jews, and concurrently built up their war machine, Muslims are building their societies in our Western shores by giving us a false image of their peaceful and integrationist intentions, while strengthening their powers. And Jews are also their great nemesis. Jews are like the canary in the coal mine, showing the approaching dangers. It is up to us to pay attention to this virulent anti-Semitism that is in the fabric of Islam, and which is surfacing in other, non-Islamic bodies and groups. Sam Solomon understands this link between anti-Semitism and Islam, and discusses it in his second book Eternal Islamic Enmity and the Jews, which I briefly review here.


Photo above:

A group of Jews, including a small boy, is escorted from the Warsaw Ghetto by German soldiers in this April 19, 1943 photo. The picture formed part of a report from SS Gen. Stroop to his Commanding Officer, and was introduced as evidence to the War Crimes trials in Nuremberg in 1945. (AP Photo) [Source: The Atlantic. Oct 16, 2011]

Read More...

^Top